Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:28

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Have you ever heard of the god Priapus being the same as the god Phosphorus?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Chinese Stocks in Hong Kong Head for Bull Market Before US Talks - Bloomberg
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Kate Middleton Glows in First Trooping the Colour After Cancer Remission - instyle.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Here’s where to get free doughnuts on National Donut Day 2025 - Fortune
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Aaron Civale traded to White Sox for Andrew Vaughn - Brew Crew Ball
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Nothing Phone (3) camera, battery and charging specs spill in new leak - Notebookcheck